Open post

Why Kindergarten Ruined Your Career

From Kindergarten onward, we’ve been programmed to picked:

  • To be chosen for the playground kickball team.
  • To get the SAT scores that’ll lead to a good college.
  • To receive the grades that will get us into our major.
  • To win the interview that’ll land a job.

For almost the first three decades of our lives, we are trained that our success depends on others choosing our résumé — whether that’s having the best portfolio among all other applicants or the fastest kickball leg in our elementary school.

So when we start seeking commissions and performances, being chosen by institutions and other people is our go-to expectation.

We expect that getting commissioned is a direct function of

  • How many prizes we’ve won
  • What schools and festivals we attended
  • How “objectively good” our music is
  • Whether we’ve impressed the right people

This. Is. NOT. TRUE.

Sure, those things help you get commissioned. But from my peers’, mentors’ and personal experience, here’s what matters far more:

  • Who are our friends and our friend’s friends?
  • What meaningful connections have we made with them?
  • How do they feel about us and our music subjectively?
  • How well we do we understand their needs and dreams?

In other words, your success at getting commissioned is a direct function of how well you nurture relationships with a wide swath of potential collaborators.

But why does this feel scary when it’s waaaay more human, meaningful, and not-weird than shoving your résumé and portfolio in someone’s face?

Look to Kindergarten. 

This is not what you’ve been trained for. You have been trained to expect that institutional approval matters more than human connections.

So if you want to get more commissions and performances, start by unlearning your Kindergarten expectations.

Open post

Field Guide Premieres in Utah

Less than a week after the successful premiere of my Clarinet Sonata (Kudos to Jaren Hinckley and Jed Moss! It was an electrifying performance!), A Field Guide to Natural History just received its Utah premiere this past week as part of BYU’s Group for New Music concerts. For those who weren’t there or who want to relive the experience, you now can in image . . .

An editor would use a red pencil as a baton. (Photo courtesy: Steve Ricks)

. . . and in sound:

Many thanks to the performers, Eric Hansen, Ray Smith, Scott Holden, and Ron Brough (whose head is hidden behind a music stand) and, of course, to the Barlow Endowment for making the night possible! As with the Clarinet Sonata, it was another great performance.

In other news, the BYU Chamber Orchestra recently began rehearsals of my still nameless violin concerto. Name suggestions are most welcome.

Book of Imaginary Beings

I received word just yesterday that my proposal to write a piece for Eric Hansen, Skyler Murray, and Scott Holden—all fabulous musicians—was accepted by the Barlow Endowment, who awarded me a grant to write a 15–20 minute piece for bass, saxophone, and piano. Seeing how the endowment has given grants to a couple dozen Pulitzer Prize winning composers, in addition to commissioning a Pulitzer Prize winning piece, this commission is kind of a big deal. It’s also my first. So between all these things, I’m pretty excited.

“So what,” you may ask, “are you thinking of doing in this new piece?”

Good question. Though I don’t yet have any specific musical ideas, I have already identified what expressive resources the instruments offer. (This is how I start every piece I write, by exploring what the instruments can do.) Though I’ve written before for sax and piano, I haven’t written anything for solo bass. In studying what it can do, I was surprised to discover that, as a solo instrument, it has a strong, articulate tenor range. If that sounds surprising, go listen to the Bach Cello Suites transcribed for solo bass, in which the instrument sounds like big, resonant cello. I’m eager to explore the possibilities here.

In addition to determining my expressive resources, I’ve also begun to get a sense for the piece’s shape and feel. It’ll be in five to seven short movements, each with a different character, though all meditating on change, loss, surprise, and imagination. And unlike my orchestra piece, this time I already have a title in mind: “Book of Imaginary Beings,” after the book by Borges (with which, apart from having the same title, it will have no relation).

So now, with a commission behind these preliminaries, I’m excited to get started!

Scroll to top